Tag Archives | state

Back Pain – A Widespread Symptom With Many Causes

It is very common for people to have some sort of back pain during their lives. Others may not. Do you have an aching back right now? Depending upon your age, you may not suffer with one until you are in your later years. The type of back pain that you have, and how you get it, will be different for each person; it really depends on your genetics, chance, and how you live your life. Women especially are prone to a possible bone fracturing condition known as Osteoporosis, which is an ordinary reason for back tenderness. The skeleton becomes easily broken and spongy with Osteoporosis, along with several cases where they essentially crumple. A bone fracture in the spine is often brought about by activity, but this doesn’t have to be anything strenuous if the bones are in a weakened state. You could even lose height with bone fractures, which can also cause malformations in the contour of the spinal column, let alone the pain that comes with it. The above mentioned is a severe state that needs advice from a medical professional, yet there are ways to make it manageable. Making sure you get habitual exercise and particular dietary supplements may assist avoidance or having power over the condition. Luckily, if caught early enough, this can be maintained by visiting a chiropractor for routine adjustments. Some doctors will actually recommend that their patients with this condition get an MRI. This is a medical test that will help determine what type of treatment is necessary. Usually, however, people only have slight curvatures which will not lead to abnormal back pain developing. Your back is actually a structure that is made up of many bones that are connected. 26 vertebrae are part of the structure. This also means that there are many possible areas where problems can occur. You could have something happen in your upper back, as well as your lower back. Lower back pain is more likely to be the result of strenuous exercise, or lifting a heavy object. Although you could have injured your lower back, pain in this area can also relate to your kidneys. If you have poor posture, upper back pain may manifest in the shoulder or neck area. Depending upon the area that is affected, you could attribute it to improper motion or exercise. A herniated disc is one of the most frequent kinds of back ache. When one of your spinal discs ruptures, you disc is displaced and this can be quite painful. The actual pain is caused by pinched nerves, which often have the feeling of electrical shocks passing through the spine. The sense you experience may range anywhere from a tickle, to a sting or maybe even a deadness. If you have stressed your back by lifting too much or over trained with your exercises; you could be liable to experience a herniated disc. This can also be the consequence of a disastrous accident. If you are worried you may be experiencing a herniated disc, you should immediately contact your physician, who will likely schedule an MRI to determine a course of action. Symptoms such as lower back pain that appear for no reason may actually be an infection in your kidneys which should be treated as soon as possible. Tumors are also a probability however this usually only develops if a person has cancer in their body already and it spreads to their back causing pain. Sometimes it might be a challenge to find the root of back pain, as it is such a common problem. If you’re experiencing back pain for any length of time and can’t identify the reason, you should see a doctor Also, it is crucial to keep your mind on what you are doing in your life and recognize the manner in which you move, perform calisthenics and sit since each of the above can be contributing factors to backaches. Dawn Masterall is one of the recognized author, She has been writing different blogs on different topics like health,diet, exercise,nutrition,supplements etc . Checkout her article on SEO Networker Affiliate and network marketing training Tagged as: diet, Exercise, Health, Health Issues, healthy living, Male Health, mens health, miscellaneous, Nutrition, staying fit, Supplements and Vitamins, Uncategorized, wellness, women’s health

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Back Pain – A Widespread Symptom With Many Causes

It is very common for people to have some sort of back pain during their lives. Others may not. Do you have an aching back right now? Depending upon your age, you may not suffer with one until you are in your later years. The type of back pain that you have, and how you get it, will be different for each person; it really depends on your genetics, chance, and how you live your life. Women especially are prone to a possible bone fracturing condition known as Osteoporosis, which is an ordinary reason for back tenderness. The skeleton becomes easily broken and spongy with Osteoporosis, along with several cases where they essentially crumple. A bone fracture in the spine is often brought about by activity, but this doesn’t have to be anything strenuous if the bones are in a weakened state. You could even lose height with bone fractures, which can also cause malformations in the contour of the spinal column, let alone the pain that comes with it. The above mentioned is a severe state that needs advice from a medical professional, yet there are ways to make it manageable. Making sure you get habitual exercise and particular dietary supplements may assist avoidance or having power over the condition. Luckily, if caught early enough, this can be maintained by visiting a chiropractor for routine adjustments. Some doctors will actually recommend that their patients with this condition get an MRI. This is a medical test that will help determine what type of treatment is necessary. Usually, however, people only have slight curvatures which will not lead to abnormal back pain developing. Your back is actually a structure that is made up of many bones that are connected. 26 vertebrae are part of the structure. This also means that there are many possible areas where problems can occur. You could have something happen in your upper back, as well as your lower back. Lower back pain is more likely to be the result of strenuous exercise, or lifting a heavy object. Although you could have injured your lower back, pain in this area can also relate to your kidneys. If you have poor posture, upper back pain may manifest in the shoulder or neck area. Depending upon the area that is affected, you could attribute it to improper motion or exercise. A herniated disc is one of the most frequent kinds of back ache. When one of your spinal discs ruptures, you disc is displaced and this can be quite painful. The actual pain is caused by pinched nerves, which often have the feeling of electrical shocks passing through the spine. The sense you experience may range anywhere from a tickle, to a sting or maybe even a deadness. If you have stressed your back by lifting too much or over trained with your exercises; you could be liable to experience a herniated disc. This can also be the consequence of a disastrous accident. If you are worried you may be experiencing a herniated disc, you should immediately contact your physician, who will likely schedule an MRI to determine a course of action. Symptoms such as lower back pain that appear for no reason may actually be an infection in your kidneys which should be treated as soon as possible. Tumors are also a probability however this usually only develops if a person has cancer in their body already and it spreads to their back causing pain. Sometimes it might be a challenge to find the root of back pain, as it is such a common problem. If you’re experiencing back pain for any length of time and can’t identify the reason, you should see a doctor Also, it is crucial to keep your mind on what you are doing in your life and recognize the manner in which you move, perform calisthenics and sit since each of the above can be contributing factors to backaches. Dawn Masterall is one of the recognized author, She has been writing different blogs on different topics like health,diet, exercise,nutrition,supplements etc . Checkout her article on SEO Networker Affiliate and network marketing training Tagged as: diet, Exercise, Health, Health Issues, healthy living, Male Health, mens health, miscellaneous, Nutrition, staying fit, Supplements and Vitamins, Uncategorized, wellness, women’s health

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Dark legacy of forced sterilizations

Sterilization victims seek compensation STORY HIGHLIGHTS California forcibly sterilized 20,000 people from 1909 to 1963 The goal was to rid society of people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives” California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s Ex-lawmaker: Californians need to face their history and hold hearings (CNN) — Sixty-seven years ago, 14-year-old Charlie Follett was living in California’s Sonoma State Home. As he did most days, Follett sat in a field, singing popular songs to himself, enjoying the sunshine and the solitude. Suddenly, someone came outside to get Follett and brought him to the hospital. They told him to lie down on an operating table, and then the needle came out. “First, they shot me with some kind of medicine. It was supposed to deaden the nerves,” he said. “Then the next thing I heard was snip, snip, and that was it.” The doctors didn’t tell Follett what they were doing, but he knew anyway. Other boys at the Sonoma State Home had told him how much it hurt to have a vasectomy. Now it was his turn. “When they did (my right side), it seemed like they were pulling my whole insides out,” said Follett, now 82 and living in Stockton. California: Leader in forced sterilizations Follett was one of 20,000 Californians forcibly sterilized by the state from 1909 to 1963. The goal was to rid society of people thought to be undesirable: people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives.” “It’s one of the most horrific and shameful chapters in California’s history,” said Los Angeles civil rights attorney Areva Martin. Thirty-two states had eugenics programs, but California was in a league of its own. I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened.Rudy Banlasan The Golden State sterilized more than twice as many people as the next state, Virginia, which sterilized 8,300, according to Paul Lombardo, a professor at Georgia State University’s College of Law. The law said that wards of the state like Follett had to be sterilized in order to be discharged from institutions like Sonoma, according to Christina Cogdell, a cultural historian at the University of California-Davis and author of “Eugenic Design.” Men and women, boys and girls, were sent to state institutions for all sorts of reasons. Some had serious developmental disabilities. Follett ended up at Sonoma because his parents were alcoholics and couldn’t care for him. In the mid-20th century, the country’s intellectual elite such as doctors, geneticists and Supreme Court justices supported forced sterilizations. In California, the eugenics movement was led by figures such as William Starr Jordan, president of Stanford University, and Harry Chandler, publisher of the Los Angeles Times. In other states, the sterilization program would stop and start due to legal challenges, but California’s ran strong for more than half a century, Cogdell said. “If you were deemed worthy of being sterilized by a doctor, there was no board where you could have a hearing to protest,” he said. In the mid-20th

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Dark legacy of forced sterilizations

Sterilization victims seek compensation STORY HIGHLIGHTS California forcibly sterilized 20,000 people from 1909 to 1963 The goal was to rid society of people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives” California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s Ex-lawmaker: Californians need to face their history and hold hearings (CNN) — Sixty-seven years ago, 14-year-old Charlie Follett was living in California’s Sonoma State Home. As he did most days, Follett sat in a field, singing popular songs to himself, enjoying the sunshine and the solitude. Suddenly, someone came outside to get Follett and brought him to the hospital. They told him to lie down on an operating table, and then the needle came out. “First, they shot me with some kind of medicine. It was supposed to deaden the nerves,” he said. “Then the next thing I heard was snip, snip, and that was it.” The doctors didn’t tell Follett what they were doing, but he knew anyway. Other boys at the Sonoma State Home had told him how much it hurt to have a vasectomy. Now it was his turn. “When they did (my right side), it seemed like they were pulling my whole insides out,” said Follett, now 82 and living in Stockton. California: Leader in forced sterilizations Follett was one of 20,000 Californians forcibly sterilized by the state from 1909 to 1963. The goal was to rid society of people thought to be undesirable: people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives.” “It’s one of the most horrific and shameful chapters in California’s history,” said Los Angeles civil rights attorney Areva Martin. Thirty-two states had eugenics programs, but California was in a league of its own. I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened.Rudy Banlasan The Golden State sterilized more than twice as many people as the next state, Virginia, which sterilized 8,300, according to Paul Lombardo, a professor at Georgia State University’s College of Law. The law said that wards of the state like Follett had to be sterilized in order to be discharged from institutions like Sonoma, according to Christina Cogdell, a cultural historian at the University of California-Davis and author of “Eugenic Design.” Men and women, boys and girls, were sent to state institutions for all sorts of reasons. Some had serious developmental disabilities. Follett ended up at Sonoma because his parents were alcoholics and couldn’t care for him. In the mid-20th century, the country’s intellectual elite such as doctors, geneticists and Supreme Court justices supported forced sterilizations. In California, the eugenics movement was led by figures such as William Starr Jordan, president of Stanford University, and Harry Chandler, publisher of the Los Angeles Times. In other states, the sterilization program would stop and start due to legal challenges, but California’s ran strong for more than half a century, Cogdell said. “If you were deemed worthy of being sterilized by a doctor, there was no board where you could have a hearing to protest,” he said. In the mid-20th century, many U.S. doctors, geneticists and judges supported forced sterilizations. California’s movement was so effective that in the 1930s, members of the Nazi party asked California eugenicists for advice on how to run their own sterilization program. “Germany used California’s program as its chief example that this was a working, successful policy,” Cogdell said. “They modeled their law on California’s law.” “It kills my last name” In 2003, then-Gov. Gray Davis apologized for the forced sterilizations, but Follett wants compensation for not be able to have children of his own. “What really ticks me off is, it kills my last name,” Follett said. “If I should die tomorrow, everything’s died.” Over the past few years, a friend of Follett’s has tried to help him seek justice. Rudy Banlasan, a nursing student, has written letters and e-mails on Follett’s behalf to Gov. Edmund “Jerry” Brown and other state politicians and officials. He has not succeeded in getting any of them to speak with him. Banlasan keeps a file of the e-mails he’s sent to politicians and the form letters he’s received in return. “I hate to sound so cynical, but I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened,” Banlasan said. “There’s nothing more to add” CNN’s attempts to contact politicians have been unsuccessful. The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization.California Department of Developmental Services The governor’s office referred CNN to the state Department of Developmental Services, which sent a two-sentence statement: “The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization that occurred through the first half of the 1900s. This was a sad and painful period in California’s history, one that should never be repeated.” When CNN asked Brown for his stance on reparations for sterilization victims, press secretary Gil Duran sent an e-mail referring to the statement. “There’s nothing more to add,” he wrote. CNN also sent e-mails and made phone calls to the office of John Perez, speaker of the California Assembly. When no response was received, CNN visited his office in Sacramento. His spokesman, John Vigna, said the speaker was tied up in meetings. “This is an issue I personally am just learning about and looking into,” Vigna said. California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s. North Carolina task force recommends $50,000 for sterilization victims In that state, Gov. Bev Perdue has sought out victims and held hearings where she apologized personally and heard their stories. She also set up a task force to help the victims and recommended that each receive $50,000 in reparations. “That’s not happening in California,” said Martin, the civil rights attorney. “To think that we’re behind on this issue instead of leading on this issue is very troublesome.” “California has not done right” Art Torres is the former California state senator who wrote the 1979 legislation outlawing sterilization. He said he’s not surprised politicians are reticent on the subject. “I would venture to say most people in this legislature — and most people in California — aren’t even aware there was a eugenics movement in California,” Torres said. Californians, he added, need to face their history and at least hold hearings and invite victims to tell their stories. “California has not done right by these victims,” Torres said. “But I think California and Californians need to be aware of their history.” CNN’s Lindsey Bomnin contributed to this story.

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Dark legacy of forced sterilizations

Sterilization victims seek compensation STORY HIGHLIGHTS California forcibly sterilized 20,000 people from 1909 to 1963 The goal was to rid society of people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives” California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s Ex-lawmaker: Californians need to face their history and hold hearings (CNN) — Sixty-seven years ago, 14-year-old Charlie Follett was living in California’s Sonoma State Home. As he did most days, Follett sat in a field, singing popular songs to himself, enjoying the sunshine and the solitude. Suddenly, someone came outside to get Follett and brought him to the hospital. They told him to lie down on an operating table, and then the needle came out. “First, they shot me with some kind of medicine. It was supposed to deaden the nerves,” he said. “Then the next thing I heard was snip, snip, and that was it.” The doctors didn’t tell Follett what they were doing, but he knew anyway. Other boys at the Sonoma State Home had told him how much it hurt to have a vasectomy. Now it was his turn. “When they did (my right side), it seemed like they were pulling my whole insides out,” said Follett, now 82 and living in Stockton. California: Leader in forced sterilizations Follett was one of 20,000 Californians forcibly sterilized by the state from 1909 to 1963. The goal was to rid society of people thought to be undesirable: people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives.” “It’s one of the most horrific and shameful chapters in California’s history,” said Los Angeles civil rights attorney Areva Martin. Thirty-two states had eugenics programs, but California was in a league of its own. I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened.Rudy Banlasan The Golden State sterilized more than twice as many people as the next state, Virginia, which sterilized 8,300, according to Paul Lombardo, a professor at Georgia State University’s College of Law. The law said that wards of the state like Follett had to be sterilized in order to be discharged from institutions like Sonoma, according to Christina Cogdell, a cultural historian at the University of California-Davis and author of “Eugenic Design.” Men and women, boys and girls, were sent to state institutions for all sorts of reasons. Some had serious developmental disabilities. Follett ended up at Sonoma because his parents were alcoholics and couldn’t care for him. In the mid-20th century, the country’s intellectual elite such as doctors, geneticists and Supreme Court justices supported forced sterilizations. In California, the eugenics movement was led by figures such as William Starr Jordan, president of Stanford University, and Harry Chandler, publisher of the Los Angeles Times. In other states, the sterilization program would stop and start due to legal challenges, but California’s ran strong for more than half a century, Cogdell said. “If you were deemed worthy of being sterilized by a doctor, there was no board where you could have a hearing to protest,” he said. In the mid-20th century, many U.S. doctors, geneticists and judges supported forced sterilizations. California’s movement was so effective that in the 1930s, members of the Nazi party asked California eugenicists for advice on how to run their own sterilization program. “Germany used California’s program as its chief example that this was a working, successful policy,” Cogdell said. “They modeled their law on California’s law.” “It kills my last name” In 2003, then-Gov. Gray Davis apologized for the forced sterilizations, but Follett wants compensation for not be able to have children of his own. “What really ticks me off is, it kills my last name,” Follett said. “If I should die tomorrow, everything’s died.” Over the past few years, a friend of Follett’s has tried to help him seek justice. Rudy Banlasan, a nursing student, has written letters and e-mails on Follett’s behalf to Gov. Edmund “Jerry” Brown and other state politicians and officials. He has not succeeded in getting any of them to speak with him. Banlasan keeps a file of the e-mails he’s sent to politicians and the form letters he’s received in return. “I hate to sound so cynical, but I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened,” Banlasan said. “There’s nothing more to add” CNN’s attempts to contact politicians have been unsuccessful. The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization.California Department of Developmental Services The governor’s office referred CNN to the state Department of Developmental Services, which sent a two-sentence statement: “The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization that occurred through the first half of the 1900s. This was a sad and painful period in California’s history, one that should never be repeated.” When CNN asked Brown for his stance on reparations for sterilization victims, press secretary Gil Duran sent an e-mail referring to the statement. “There’s nothing more to add,” he wrote. CNN also sent e-mails and made phone calls to the office of John Perez, speaker of the California Assembly. When no response was received, CNN visited his office in Sacramento. His spokesman, John Vigna, said the speaker was tied up in meetings. “This is an issue I personally am just learning about and looking into,” Vigna said. California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s. North Carolina task force recommends $50,000 for sterilization victims In that state, Gov. Bev Perdue has sought out victims and held hearings where she apologized personally and heard their stories. She also set up a task force to help the victims and recommended that each receive $50,000 in reparations. “That’s not happening in California,” said Martin, the civil rights attorney. “To think that we’re behind on this issue instead of leading on this issue is very troublesome.” “California has not done right” Art Torres is the former California state senator who wrote the 1979 legislation outlawing sterilization. He said he’s not surprised politicians are reticent on the subject. “I would venture to say most people in this legislature — and most people in California — aren’t even aware there was a eugenics movement in California,” Torres said. Californians, he added, need to face their history and at least hold hearings and invite victims to tell their stories. “California has not done right by these victims,” Torres said. “But I think California and Californians need to be aware of their history.” CNN’s Lindsey Bomnin contributed to this story.

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Dark legacy of forced sterilizations

Sterilization victims seek compensation STORY HIGHLIGHTS California forcibly sterilized 20,000 people from 1909 to 1963 The goal was to rid society of people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives” California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s Ex-lawmaker: Californians need to face their history and hold hearings (CNN) — Sixty-seven years ago, 14-year-old Charlie Follett was living in California’s Sonoma State Home. As he did most days, Follett sat in a field, singing popular songs to himself, enjoying the sunshine and the solitude. Suddenly, someone came outside to get Follett and brought him to the hospital. They told him to lie down on an operating table, and then the needle came out. “First, they shot me with some kind of medicine. It was supposed to deaden the nerves,” he said. “Then the next thing I heard was snip, snip, and that was it.” The doctors didn’t tell Follett what they were doing, but he knew anyway. Other boys at the Sonoma State Home had told him how much it hurt to have a vasectomy. Now it was his turn. “When they did (my right side), it seemed like they were pulling my whole insides out,” said Follett, now 82 and living in Stockton. California: Leader in forced sterilizations Follett was one of 20,000 Californians forcibly sterilized by the state from 1909 to 1963. The goal was to rid society of people thought to be undesirable: people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives.” “It’s one of the most horrific and shameful chapters in California’s history,” said Los Angeles civil rights attorney Areva Martin. Thirty-two states had eugenics programs, but California was in a league of its own. I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened.Rudy Banlasan The Golden State sterilized more than twice as many people as the next state, Virginia, which sterilized 8,300, according to Paul Lombardo, a professor at Georgia State University’s College of Law. The law said that wards of the state like Follett had to be sterilized in order to be discharged from institutions like Sonoma, according to Christina Cogdell, a cultural historian at the University of California-Davis and author of “Eugenic Design.” Men and women, boys and girls, were sent to state institutions for all sorts of reasons. Some had serious developmental disabilities. Follett ended up at Sonoma because his parents were alcoholics and couldn’t care for him. In the mid-20th century, the country’s intellectual elite such as doctors, geneticists and Supreme Court justices supported forced sterilizations. In California, the eugenics movement was led by figures such as William Starr Jordan, president of Stanford University, and Harry Chandler, publisher of the Los Angeles Times. In other states, the sterilization program would stop

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Dark legacy of forced sterilizations

Sterilization victims seek compensation STORY HIGHLIGHTS California forcibly sterilized 20,000 people from 1909 to 1963 The goal was to rid society of people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives” California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s Ex-lawmaker: Californians need to face their history and hold hearings (CNN) — Sixty-seven years ago, 14-year-old Charlie Follett was living in California’s Sonoma State Home. As he did most days, Follett sat in a field, singing popular songs to himself, enjoying the sunshine and the solitude. Suddenly, someone came outside to get Follett and brought him to the hospital. They told him to lie down on an operating table, and then the needle came out. “First, they shot me with some kind of medicine. It was supposed to deaden the nerves,” he said. “Then the next thing I heard was snip, snip, and that was it.” The doctors didn’t tell Follett what they were doing, but he knew anyway. Other boys at the Sonoma State Home had told him how much it hurt to have a vasectomy. Now it was his turn. “When they did (my right side), it seemed like they were pulling my whole insides out,” said Follett, now 82 and living in Stockton. California: Leader in forced sterilizations Follett was one of 20,000 Californians forcibly sterilized by the state from 1909 to 1963. The goal was to rid society of people thought to be undesirable: people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives.” “It’s one of the most horrific and shameful chapters in California’s history,” said Los Angeles civil rights attorney Areva Martin. Thirty-two states had eugenics programs, but California was in a league of its own. I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened.Rudy Banlasan The Golden State sterilized more than twice as many people as the next state, Virginia, which sterilized 8,300, according to Paul Lombardo, a professor at Georgia State University’s College of Law. The law said that wards of the state like Follett had to be sterilized in order to be discharged from institutions like Sonoma, according to Christina Cogdell, a cultural historian at the University of California-Davis and author of “Eugenic Design.” Men and women, boys and girls, were sent to state institutions for all sorts of reasons. Some had serious developmental disabilities. Follett ended up at Sonoma because his parents were alcoholics and couldn’t care for him. In the mid-20th century, the country’s intellectual elite such as doctors, geneticists and Supreme Court justices supported forced sterilizations. In California, the eugenics movement was led by figures such as William Starr Jordan, president of Stanford University, and Harry Chandler, publisher of the Los Angeles Times. In other states, the sterilization program would stop and start due to legal challenges, but California’s ran strong for more than half a century, Cogdell said. “If you were deemed worthy of being sterilized by a doctor, there was no board where you could have a hearing to protest,” he said. In the mid-20th century, many U.S. doctors, geneticists and judges supported forced sterilizations. California’s movement was so effective that in the 1930s, members of the Nazi party asked California eugenicists for advice on how to run their own sterilization program. “Germany used California’s program as its chief example that this was a working, successful policy,” Cogdell said. “They modeled their law on California’s law.” “It kills my last name” In 2003, then-Gov. Gray Davis apologized for the forced sterilizations, but Follett wants compensation for not be able to have children of his own. “What really ticks me off is, it kills my last name,” Follett said. “If I should die tomorrow, everything’s died.” Over the past few years, a friend of Follett’s has tried to help him seek justice. Rudy Banlasan, a nursing student, has written letters and e-mails on Follett’s behalf to Gov. Edmund “Jerry” Brown and other state politicians and officials. He has not succeeded in getting any of them to speak with him. Banlasan keeps a file of the e-mails he’s sent to politicians and the form letters he’s received in return. “I hate to sound so cynical, but I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened,” Banlasan said. “There’s nothing more to add” CNN’s attempts to contact politicians have been unsuccessful. The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization.California Department of Developmental Services The governor’s office referred CNN to the state Department of Developmental Services, which sent a two-sentence statement: “The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization that occurred through the first half of the 1900s. This was a sad and painful period in California’s history, one that should never be repeated.” When CNN asked Brown for his stance on reparations for sterilization victims, press secretary Gil Duran sent an e-mail referring to the statement. “There’s nothing more to add,” he wrote. CNN also sent e-mails and made phone calls to the office of John Perez, speaker of the California Assembly. When no response was received, CNN visited his office in Sacramento. His spokesman, John Vigna, said the speaker was tied up in meetings. “This is an issue I personally am just learning about and looking into,” Vigna said. California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s. North Carolina task force recommends $50,000 for sterilization victims In that state, Gov. Bev Perdue has sought out victims and held hearings where she apologized personally and heard their stories. She also set up a task force to help the victims and recommended that each receive $50,000 in reparations. “That’s not happening in California,” said Martin, the civil rights attorney. “To think that we’re behind on this issue instead of leading on this issue is very troublesome.” “California has not done right” Art Torres is the former California state senator who wrote the 1979 legislation outlawing sterilization. He said he’s not surprised politicians are reticent on the subject. “I would venture to say most people in this legislature — and most people in California — aren’t even aware there was a eugenics movement in California,” Torres said. Californians, he added, need to face their history and at least hold hearings and invite victims to tell their stories. “California has not done right by these victims,” Torres said. “But I think California and Californians need to be aware of their history.”

Read full story Comments { 0 }

A dark legacy of forced sterilizations

Sterilization victims seek compensation STORY HIGHLIGHTS California forcibly sterilized 20,000 people from 1909 to 1963 The goal was to rid society of people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives” California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s Ex-lawmaker: Californians need to face their history and hold hearings (CNN) — Sixty-seven years ago, 14-year-old Charlie Follett was living in California’s Sonoma State Home. As he did most days, Follett sat in a field, singing popular songs to himself, enjoying the sunshine and the solitude. Suddenly, someone came outside to get Follett and brought him to the hospital. They told him to lie down on an operating table, and then the needle came out. “First, they shot me with some kind of medicine. It was supposed to deaden the nerves,” he said. “Then the next thing I heard was snip, snip, and that was it.” The doctors didn’t tell Follett what they were doing, but he knew anyway. Other boys at the Sonoma State Home had told him how much it hurt to have a vasectomy. Now it was his turn. “When they did (my right side), it seemed like they were pulling my whole insides out,” said Follett, now 82 and living in Stockton. California: Leader in forced sterilizations Follett was one of 20,000 Californians forcibly sterilized by the state from 1909 to 1963. The goal was to rid society of people thought to be undesirable: people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives.” “It’s one of the most horrific and shameful chapters in California’s history,” said Los Angeles civil rights attorney Areva Martin. Thirty-two states had eugenics programs, but California was in a league of its own. I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened.Rudy Banlasan The Golden State sterilized more than twice as many people as the next state, Virginia, which sterilized 8,300, according to Paul Lombardo, a professor at Georgia State University’s College of Law. The law said that wards of the state like Follett had to be sterilized in order to be discharged from institutions like Sonoma, according to Christina Cogdell, a cultural historian at the University of California-Davis and author of “Eugenic Design.” Men and women, boys and girls, were sent to state institutions for all sorts of reasons. Some had serious developmental disabilities. Follett ended up at Sonoma because his parents were alcoholics and couldn’t care for him. In the mid-20th century, the country’s intellectual elite such as doctors, geneticists and Supreme Court justices supported forced sterilizations. In California, the eugenics movement was led by figures such as William Starr Jordan, president of Stanford University, and Harry Chandler, publisher of the Los Angeles Times. In other states, the sterilization program would stop and start due to legal challenges, but California’s ran strong for more than half a century, Cogdell said. “If you were deemed worthy of being sterilized by a doctor, there was no board where you could have a hearing to protest,” he said. In the mid-20th century, many U.S. doctors, geneticists and judges supported forced sterilizations. California’s movement was so effective that in the 1930s, members of the Nazi party asked California eugenicists for advice on how to run their own sterilization program. “Germany used California’s program as its chief example that this was a working, successful policy,” Cogdell said. “They modeled their law on California’s law.” “It kills my last name” In 2003, then-Gov. Gray Davis apologized for the forced sterilizations, but Follett wants compensation for not be able to have children of his own. “What really ticks me off is, it kills my last name,” Follett said. “If I should die tomorrow, everything’s died.” Over the past few years, a friend of Follett’s has tried to help him seek justice. Rudy Banlasan, a nursing student, has written letters and e-mails on Follett’s behalf to Gov. Edmund “Jerry” Brown and other state politicians and officials. He has not succeeded in getting any of them to speak with him. Banlasan keeps a file of the e-mails he’s sent to politicians and the form letters he’s received in return. “I hate to sound so cynical, but I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened,” Banlasan said. “There’s nothing more to add” CNN’s attempts to contact politicians have been unsuccessful. The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization.California Department of Developmental Services The governor’s office referred CNN to the state Department of Developmental Services, which sent a two-sentence statement: “The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization that occurred through the first half of the 1900s. This was a sad and painful period in California’s history, one that should never be repeated.” When CNN asked Brown for his stance on reparations for sterilization victims, press secretary Gil Duran sent an e-mail referring to the statement. “There’s nothing more to add,” he wrote. CNN also sent e-mails and made phone calls to the office of John Perez, speaker of the California Assembly. When no response was received, CNN visited his office in Sacramento. His spokesman, John Vigna, said the speaker was tied up in meetings. “This is an issue I personally am just learning about and looking into,” Vigna said. California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s. North Carolina task force recommends $50,000 for sterilization victims In that state, Gov. Bev Perdue has sought out victims and held hearings where she apologized personally and heard their stories. She also set up a task force to help the victims and recommended that each receive $50,000 in reparations. “That’s not happening in California,” said Martin, the civil rights attorney. “To think that we’re behind on this issue instead of leading on this issue is very troublesome.” “California has not done right” Art Torres is the former California state senator who wrote the 1979 legislation outlawing sterilization. He said he’s not surprised politicians are reticent on the subject. “I would venture to say most people in this legislature — and most people in California — aren’t even aware there was a eugenics movement in California,” Torres said. Californians, he added, need to face their history and at least hold hearings and invite victims to tell their stories. “California has not done right by these victims,” Torres said. “But I think California and Californians need to be aware of their history.”

Read full story Comments { 0 }

A dark legacy of forced sterilizations

Sterilization victims seek compensation STORY HIGHLIGHTS California forcibly sterilized 20,000 people from 1909 to 1963 The goal was to rid society of people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives” California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s Ex-lawmaker: Californians need to face their history and hold hearings (CNN) — Sixty-seven years ago, 14-year-old Charlie Follett was living in California’s Sonoma State Home. As he did most days, Follett sat in a field, singing popular songs to himself, enjoying the sunshine and the solitude. Suddenly, someone came outside to get Follett and brought him to the hospital. They told him to lie down on an operating table, and then the needle came out. “First, they shot me with some kind of medicine. It was supposed to deaden the nerves,” he said. “Then the next thing I heard was snip, snip, and that was it.” The doctors didn’t tell Follett what they were doing, but he knew anyway. Other boys at the Sonoma State Home had told him how much it hurt to have a vasectomy. Now it was his turn. “When they did (my right side), it seemed like they were pulling my whole insides out,” said Follett, now 82 and living in Stockton. California: Leader in forced sterilizations Follett was one of 20,000 Californians forcibly sterilized by the state from 1909 to 1963. The goal was to rid society of people thought to be undesirable: people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives.” “It’s one of the most horrific and shameful chapters in California’s history,” said Los Angeles civil rights attorney Areva Martin. Thirty-two states had eugenics programs, but California was in a league of its own. I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened.Rudy Banlasan The Golden State sterilized more than twice as many people as the next state, Virginia, which sterilized 8,300, according to Paul Lombardo, a professor at Georgia State University’s College of Law. The law said that wards of the state like Follett had to be sterilized in order to be discharged from institutions like Sonoma, according to Christina Cogdell, a cultural historian at the University of California-Davis and author of “Eugenic Design.” Men and women, boys and girls, were sent to state institutions for all sorts of reasons. Some had serious developmental disabilities. Follett ended up at Sonoma because his parents were alcoholics and couldn’t care for him. In the mid-20th century, the country’s intellectual elite such as doctors, geneticists and Supreme Court justices supported forced sterilizations. In California, the

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Dark legacy of forced sterilizations

Sterilization victims seek compensation STORY HIGHLIGHTS California forcibly sterilized 20,000 people from 1909 to 1963 The goal was to rid society of people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives” California’s response to victims stands in stark contrast to North Carolina’s Ex-lawmaker: Californians need to face their history and hold hearings (CNN) — Sixty-seven years ago, 14-year-old Charlie Follett was living in California’s Sonoma State Home. As he did most days, Follett sat in a field, singing popular songs to himself, enjoying the sunshine and the solitude. Suddenly, someone came outside to get Follett and brought him to the hospital. They told him to lie down on an operating table, and then the needle came out. “First, they shot me with some kind of medicine. It was supposed to deaden the nerves,” he said. “Then the next thing I heard was snip, snip, and that was it.” The doctors didn’t tell Follett what they were doing, but he knew anyway. Other boys at the Sonoma State Home had told him how much it hurt to have a vasectomy. Now it was his turn. “When they did (my right side), it seemed like they were pulling my whole insides out,” said Follett, now 82 and living in Stockton. California: Leader in forced sterilizations Follett was one of 20,000 Californians forcibly sterilized by the state from 1909 to 1963. The goal was to rid society of people thought to be undesirable: people labeled “feeble-minded” or “defectives.” “It’s one of the most horrific and shameful chapters in California’s history,” said Los Angeles civil rights attorney Areva Martin. Thirty-two states had eugenics programs, but California was in a league of its own. I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened.Rudy Banlasan The Golden State sterilized more than twice as many people as the next state, Virginia, which sterilized 8,300, according to Paul Lombardo, a professor at Georgia State University’s College of Law. The law said that wards of the state like Follett had to be sterilized in order to be discharged from institutions like Sonoma, according to Christina Cogdell, a cultural historian at the University of California-Davis and author of “Eugenic Design.” Men and women, boys and girls, were sent to state institutions for all sorts of reasons. Some had serious developmental disabilities. Follett ended up at Sonoma because his parents were alcoholics and couldn’t care for him. In the mid-20th century, the country’s intellectual elite such as doctors, geneticists and Supreme Court justices supported forced sterilizations. In California, the eugenics movement was led by figures such as William Starr Jordan, president of Stanford University, and Harry Chandler, publisher of the Los Angeles Times. In other states, the sterilization program would stop and start due to legal challenges, but California’s ran strong for more than half a century, Cogdell said. “If you were deemed worthy of being sterilized by a doctor, there was no board where you could have a hearing to protest,” he said. In the mid-20th century, many U.S. doctors, geneticists and judges supported forced sterilizations. California’s movement was so effective that in the 1930s, members of the Nazi party asked California eugenicists for advice on how to run their own sterilization program. “Germany used California’s program as its chief example that this was a working, successful policy,” Cogdell said. “They modeled their law on California’s law.” “It kills my last name” In 2003, then-Gov. Gray Davis apologized for the forced sterilizations, but Follett wants compensation for not be able to have children of his own. “What really ticks me off is, it kills my last name,” Follett said. “If I should die tomorrow, everything’s died.” Over the past few years, a friend of Follett’s has tried to help him seek justice. Rudy Banlasan, a nursing student, has written letters and e-mails on Follett’s behalf to Gov. Edmund “Jerry” Brown and other state politicians and officials. He has not succeeded in getting any of them to speak with him. Banlasan keeps a file of the e-mails he’s sent to politicians and the form letters he’s received in return. “I hate to sound so cynical, but I think they’re just waiting for the victims to die and forget this whole thing ever happened,” Banlasan said. “There’s nothing more to add” CNN’s attempts to contact politicians have been unsuccessful. The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization.California Department of Developmental Services The governor’s office referred CNN to the state Department of Developmental Services, which sent a two-sentence statement: “The State of California deeply regrets the harm caused to victims of involuntary sterilization that occurred through the first half of the 1900s. This was a sad and painful period in California’s history, one that should never be repeated.” When CNN asked Brown for his stance on reparations for sterilization victims, press secretary Gil Duran sent an e-mail referring to the statement. “There’s nothing more to add,” he wrote. CNN also sent e-mails and made phone calls to the office of John Perez, speaker

Read full story Comments { 0 }